Men brisk walking VS jogging, which one is better for weight loss

There are many ways to lose weight, and brisk walking and jogging are also favored by many people who want to lose weight. Which of these two exercises, brisk walking or jogging, is more effective in losing weight? This is also a question that many friends are concerned about. The weight loss effects of brisk walking and jogging are as follows:

From the perspective of fat reduction effect

In terms of the fat-reducing effects of these two sports, running is more effective in the same amount of time. The calories burned by running for 40 minutes require at least one hour of brisk walking to achieve the same effect, and the heart rate during brisk walking must reach 85/100 of running, that is, it must be kept between 50 and 55 to be effective. If the energy consumption of brisk walking and running is calculated using the Weir formula, the results are: brisk walking 22.18±3.68, running 41.34±7.32.

Why jogging is good

Running, especially jogging, is a simple aerobic exercise that can activate muscles throughout the body, quickly burn body fat, and achieve the goal of losing weight. However, the actual fat burning time is 30 minutes after exercise, so running exercise must be persisted for at least half an hour to be effective. Running exercise for more than 30 minutes can consume a large amount of glycogen and fat in the body, and also cause the body to be hypoxic, so that fat can be quickly consumed. If you want to have such an effect with brisk walking, you need to exercise for at least 1 hour.

After the brief introduction above, we roughly know that in the same period of time, jogging is better than brisk walking in weight loss because jogging consumes more energy.